It’s going to be rarely that I write a post on this blog because of a pet peeve. But in this case, I can’t help it.
I’m really annoyed.
Thereby, continuing to scare off people who may well need the medical intervention of an anti-depressant to prevent things like…well, suicide.
OK, fine, there may be some small percentage of people who have an increase in suicidal thoughts and behaviors after starting an anti-depressant. But there are two things to consider here:
– the patients may well have had such thoughts beforehand, and careful monitoring is the key element in care for these cases
– how many more who are treated have a subsequent DECREASE in suicidality?
What’s the cause of all this black box mania? It’s the irrational perspective that we somehow need to have risk-free, side-effect-free medicines. It’s a fantasy, though one that lawyers, media types, regulation-huggers love to indulge. And even if a medication does good for a huge percentage of people, and perhaps has negative effects on a few, everyone has to cover their backside by issuing (perhaps extreme) warnings.
We hear warnings about drug companies being guilty of disease-mongering. But what is the human cost of fear-mongering, so that people aren’t helped who need to be? If black box warnings scare off 100 seriously depressed people from using a medication that might keep them from jumping off a building in despair, for the sake of one who might have an increase in suicidal thoughts – is that a good trade-off??
Yes, I have a dog in this fight, because I have been successfully treated – probably the word “transformed” is more accurate – with an anti-depressant. And it irks me that people parlay scary scenarios touching a few, into major headlines that may negatively impact far more.
Pretty soon we’ll be sticking black-box warnings on babies in their hospital cribs. After all, life is dangerous, and full of side-effects…
(Image credit: FLickr)